Tag Archives: Attacking tactics

Application of Chess Tactics: Deflection

3
Filed under Attacking tactics, Chess Basics, Chess lessons, Chess tactics, Chess Tutorials
Tagged as attacking chess, attacking chess tactics, Attacking tactics, Chess tactics, Chess Tutorials

In part 9 of different chess tactics, we showed how deflection is used to force a key defender away so that the opponent became vulnerable to attack and had to face significant loss of material or even checkmate.

One reader requested for some more examples beyond those used as illustration in that article. You know it needs quite some effort to collect examples from different sources, but that is why we are here, aren’t we? So, we are giving below ten positions with deflection as the motif from games spread over nearly a century of chess. All these games can be seen and played out at Chessgames site and we have provided the links below each position to facilitate your search.

Click here for full game
Click here for full game
 
 
Click here for full game
Click here for full game
 
 
Click here for full game
Click here for full game
 
 
Click here for full game
Click here for full game
 
 
Click here for full game
Click here for full game
 
 

The above examples should give you enough ideas to enable you to use such tactics in your games when the opportunity arises.

We hope to bring to you such collected examples also on other chess tactics that we discussed.

Chess Tactics in application

4
Filed under Attacking tactics, Chess Basics, Chess lessons, Chess tactics, Chess Tutorials, Defensive strategy
Tagged as attacking chess, attacking chess tactics, Attacking tactics, Chess tactics, Chess Tutorials

In our ten-part article series on chess tactics (starting with 12 chess tactics … – Part 1), we have discussed the different tactics that go into different combinations. You have seen excerpts from chess games that illustrated the use of such chess tactics.

Now I would like to show you some full games that abound in such tactics and are quite exciting to play out. The purists may argue that the loser played poorly, allowing the brilliant attacking tactics and sacrifices of the winner to come through. But as we mentioned somewhere, all brilliancies result from some inaccurate play by the loser. Would you agree that if both players play perfect chess, the only outcome is a draw? Moreover, a post-game analysis taking your own time with a Rybka or Fritz or something like those by your side to find the mistakes of the loser is completely different from thinking up combinations to exploit the weak moves of the loser under tournament conditions. Just ask yourself – how many of such critics would be able to create those brilliancies on their own within the time limits of the game? Very few, I’m sure. So, instead of getting into those arguments, just try to enjoy the winner’s moves.

Here follows a game that I have thoroughly enjoyed in playing through. The winner sacrificed all his minor pieces to steam-roll his attack and all the material advantages of the loser ultimately came to nothing.

Glucksberg-Najdorf, Warsaw, 1929
Dutch Defense (ECO: A85)

1. d4 f5
2. c4 Nf6
3. Nc3 e6
4. Nf3 d5
5. e3 c6
6. Bd3 Bd6
7. O-O O-O
8. Ne2 Nbd7
9. Ng5 Was he thinking of a knight fork with 10. Ne6? He should have expected Black’s next move.

 
9. Bxh2+
10. Kh1 Ng4 10. Kxh2 brings 11. … Ng4+ 12. Kg1 Qxg5
11. f4 Qe8
12. g3 Qh5
13. Kg2 Bg1
14. Nxg1 Qh2+
15. Kf3 e5
16. dxe5 Ndxe5+
17. fxe5 Nxe5+
18. Kf4 Ng6+
19. Kf3 f4
20. exf4 20. Bxg6 Bg4+ 21. Kxg4 Qxg3+ 22. Kh5 hXg6+ 23. Kxg6 Rf6+ 24. Kh5 Rh6#

 
20. Bg4+
21. Kxg4 Ne5+
22. fxe5 h5#

 

Some of you may raise the doubt that Najdorf could produce such an attack because of the weak opponent. To dispel this doubt, here is another game played by him against a stronger opponent. This game is also an excellent example of attacking tactics. However, Black could possibly salvage a draw at some stage, but with two pieces up, who would think that negatively when unble to guess White’s plans?

Najdorf-Szapiro, Lodz, 1929
French Defense (ECO: C10)

1. e4 e6
2. d4 d5
3. Nc3 dxe4
4. Nxe4 Nd7
5. Nf3 Ngf6
6. Bd3 Be7
7. O-O b6
8. Ne5 Bb7
9. Nxf6+ gxf6

 
10. Nxf7 Kxf7
11. Qh5+ Kg8
12. Re1 Nf8
13. Rxe6 Nxe6
14. Bc4 Qd6
15. Bh6 Bf8
16. Re1 Bc8 16. … Bxh6 17. Bxe6+ Kg7 18. Qf7#
17. Qe8 Bd7

 
18. Rxe6 Rxe8
19. Rxe8+ Be6
20. Bxe6+ Qxe6
21. Rxf8#

 

12 chess tactics and how to use those to gain advantage – Part 10, 11 and 12

4
Filed under Attacking tactics, Chess Basics, Chess lessons, Chess tactics, Chess Tutorials, Defensive strategy
Tagged as attacking chess, attacking chess tactics, Attacking tactics, Chess tactics, Chess Tutorials

In English, a “baker’s dozen” means 13 and not 12, originating from an old practice of bakers giving one loaf extra when someone bought a dozen! Borrowing the idea in a converse sense, I am writing ten articles to cover the 12 chess tactics. Earlier, we devoted one article for each tactics to avoid cluttering up the lessons. But in this one, we have covered the remaining three tactics. The reason for this will be clear from what I have explained below.

10. Zugzwang

This tactic has already been discussed at length in two earlier articles viz. Chess Tactics: should some of them be prohibited? and Chess Tactics: Some more applications of Zugzwang. We have included the topic here only for bringing the different tactics within one series. If you take the trouble of going through the articles mentioned, you will get a fair idea of what this tactic involves.

11. Zwischenzug

What has been said above applies here also. We will request you to take a look at our earlier articles Chess Tactics: Catching Opponent on Wrong Foot and Chess Tactics: more on Zwischenzug where we tried to explain what this “mouthful” tactic means and how it is applied.

12. Stalemate

Unlike all the previous 11 chess tactics which are used to attack the opponent’s position, this one is a defensive tactics. A stalemate arises when the player with the move is unable to make any legal move while his King is not under check. Had the King been under check, this situation would mean a checkmate and defeat for the player so constrained. But a stalemate means a draw and many a clever player has been able to salvage a draw in a hopeless position by maneuvering to create a stalemate condition for himself!

On the other hand, particularly when you have undisputed and even overwhelming superiority in a position, you should be especially careful about this defensive resource. You should move the pieces carefully and be wary of picking up pawns or pieces apparently left unguarded by the defender, if such move does not render a check. Otherwise you may be left to rue for missing a sure win!

Let us first look at some positions to find how the stalemate came about.

You can see that Black has an obviously superior position. Once he can get the Queens exchanged (and even otherwise), it is a matter of time that the connected King-side passed pawns will win for him. How does he play his winning hand?

43. Kd1 Qc3 Almost any move other than this one would give Black a win!
 
44. Qg8+ Kxg8 White accepted the lifeline with both hands and Black had to accept the Queen offer. White is now in
stalemate – game drawn.

 

Black is a piece up and has a passed RP. He is ready for attack on the cornered White King. He should expect that White would try to find some escape route from a sure defeat.

49. Qd2 Rxd3 Black is still in grabbing mood, otherwise he could have played 49. … Qh3+ and then bring out his Bishop via h6.
50. Rxf8+ Kxf8
51. Qh6+ drawn If Black captured the Queen, it would be stalemate. If he moved his King, the White Queen could continue giving checks, sitting by the side of Black King if necessary! Black had to accept the draw.

 

Black is in a losing situation as he cannot stop the White QNP from promotion without giving up his Rook. So he found the way to a stalemate for snatching a draw!

54. b5 Re3
55. b6 Re1+ White had eye only for promoting his pawn as quickly as possible, so he failed to see through Black’s plan!
56. Rxe1 drawn

 

Because of his King-side connected passed pawns, Black’s win seems certain. But some inaccurate moves by him gave White the opportunity to a stalemate and it is quite amusing to see the White Rook’s antics!

58. Kb4 Rb3+
59. Kxa4 Rxb2 Now White has been able to put his King in a walled space from where it cannot come out. So he has a merry time making his Rook jump around to chase the Black King, challenging a capture!
60. Rd7+ Kh6
61. Rh7+ Kg5
62. Rxh5+ Kf6
63. Rf5+ Kg7
64. Rf7+ Kh6
65. Rh7+ Kg5
66. Rh5+ gxh5 Black had enough of this circus and accepted the draw!

 

In the next two examples, the games ended in decisive results only because the losers missed (and obviously the winners also overlooked) the moves that could give a draw through stalemate.

Black obviously is in poor shape and though White still has to keep an eye on Black’s RP, his KBP is also nearing promotion and more importantly, he is in a position to deliver checkmate soon.

67. f6 Qe8
68. Qxh3 Qb8+ Black missed his opportunity here. If instead he played 68. … Qe6+, White would be forced to reply 69. Qxe6 and Black would not have any move i.e., stalemate and draw.
 
With the text move, Black resigned after another nine moves when the following position was reached (78. Qc5+)

 

Our final example shows the position just before the last moves. After Black played 59. … b3, White resigned possibly considering the mating threats by Black Queen from any of g2, g4 and h1 squares. Neither of the players realized that Black’s last move created the opportunity for White to get a draw through stalemate.

59. Rd3+ b3 Black could have played 59. … Rc3 and White would have to surrender sooner or later. But now the game could have continued:

60. Rxb3+ Kxa2 61. Ra3+ Kb2 (61. … Kxa3 62. Qa4+ or Qd3+ would force exchange of Queens by Black, leaving White with no move) 62. Qb5+ Kxa3 (if the King moved to c1, White would get a winning position!) 63. Qd3+ forcing a stalemate.

 

There are examples galore in chess annals for stalemate or missed stalemate as these samples spanning a century from 1880 to 1980 amply demonstrate. When all seems lost, be on the lookout for a stalemate possibility and you need not feel like a swindler because stalemate is a legitimate rule of chess!