Tag Archives: attacking chess

Chess Tactics to use the might of the Passed Pawn

1
Filed under Attacking tactics, Chess lessons, Chess tactics
Tagged as ,

We keep bringing this up from time to time because this aspect of chess games occurs quite frequently to influence the course of the game. In Chess Tactics: A protected passed pawn is a passport to win, you were introduced to this aspect and Chess Tactics in Middle Game: Power of the Passed Pawn elaborated on this theme. Chess Tactics in Middle Game: Give up Queens to get Passed Pawns! as also Chess Sacrifice as a Chess Tactics: creating passed pawn showed you the lengths to which a player can go to create a passed pawn to this end. We also showed in Chess Sacrifice as a Chess Tactics: promoting a passed pawn how a player can doggedly pursue the course to promote a pawn successfully.

If you think that I am being overly enthusiastic about the power of a passed pawn, you may take a look at the position shown in the following diagram. This position occurred after 29 moves in a game played between Evgeni Vasiukov and Rashid Nezhmetdinov during tournament held at Kharkov in 1956.

Evgeni Vasiukov (b.1933) became an IM in 1958 and GM in 1961. He won the Moscow Championship six times. He scored victories against many of the notable Russian players like Bronstein, Smyslov, Tal, Petrosian, Keres, Polugaevsky etc. but not against Spassky, Karpov and Korchnoi.

Rashid Nezhmetdinov was introduced to you in Importance of chess strategy – Part 1 and has been featured several times after that.

the passed pawn waiting to show its power

When you look at the position, who draws your attention first? Isn’t it that tiny passed pawn of Black, physically and metaphorically in the centre of the field? It is already in the focus of the opposing Rooks and Bishops. Otherwise, both players seem to have equal chances though Black Queen and Knight are in slightly more active position to launch attack on the White King. Let us see how everything gets tied up to the progress of that passed pawn. The immediate threats by Black were 30. … e3 31. Rxe3 Rxe3 32. Qxe3 Nxf4 33. Qxf4 Qxh3+ 34. Kg1 Qxg2#.

Here is the saga of the passed pawn:

30. Qe3 Nh4  
31. Rc1 Qg6  
32. Rg1 Bxd4   Black removed the piece that could help in White’s defense against his plans.
 
33. Qxd4 Nf5   The Knight move freed the pin on e-pawn with a tempo by attacking the Queen.
34. Qd1 e3  
35. Be5 e2   White’s best bet was possibly 35. Bxf5 to exchange his inactive Bishop for the troublesome Knight. Instead, White tried to cut-off the Rook support, but the Pawn did not need it! It went ahead chasing the Queen while clearing the line for Black’s Bishop. Of course, the Pawn was taboo because of 36. Qxe2 Ng3+ winning the Queen
 
36. Qe1 Ng3+   The Knight came to support the pawn …
 
37. Kh2 Nf1+   … but the Knight now ventures further with the support of the Pawn! The Pawn ensured that capturing the Knight meant suffering checkmate.
 
38. Kh1 Qg3   White resigned because to tackle the double-threat of 39. … Qh2# or 39. … Qxh3#, he had to exchange the queen through 39. Qxg3 Nxg3+ 40. Kh2 Nf1+. But Black would recover his Queen through Pawn promotion on next move e.g., 41. Kh1 e8=Q or 41. Rxf1 exf1=Q

 

Position after Black’s 38th move.

the passed pawn standing tall above alll

Would you agree with me now? Incidentally, Mikhail Botvinnik, the 6th World Champion had this to say about the winner: “Nobody sees combinations as Rashid Nezhmetdinov”.

 

Chess Tactics: using the diagonals to break enemy King’s castle

0
Filed under Attacking tactics, Chess tactics
Tagged as , , ,

There is a recent series of articles on attacking chess tactics by my colleague teaching you in detail about the positional requirements and the chess tactics for Bishop sacrifice at h7 to break open the Kingside castle of the opponent for a quick win.

Nice articles though they were, I was peeved at his giving all the fun to the White player. Why the poor Black should always be at the receiving end? A little more of it and very soon we may get blamed for having a color prejudice!

So I started looking for some game where Black turns the table and pays White in a similar coin, a White who learned the tricks from the aforesaid articles and felt that he could get away by breaking into someone’s home!

The game was played between Eric Lundin and Isaac Boleslavsky in the Groningen tournament of 1946. It is not exactly in the line as described to you in the aforesaid articles, and the sacrifice starts with a Knight and not a Bishop, but the ideas are similar (which is why I said ‘a similar coin’ instead of ‘the same coin’)!

Eric Lundin (1904-1988) was a ten times winner of Swedish Championship. Over a span of 30 years from 1930-1960, he represented Sweden in nine Chess Olympiads. He received IM title in 1950 and an Honorary GM title in 1983.

Isaac Boleslavsky (1919-1977) won the Ukraine Championship in 1938. He came into prominence after World War 2 and became the first plyer ever to remain undefeated in the Candidates’ tournament in 1950 for selecting the next challenger to reigning World Champion Mikhail Botvinnik. After remaining tied with David Bronstein in this tournament as also in the 12-game playoff match, he lost in the second tie-break game. He later devoted his time to coaching. He made several contributions to opening theories in King’s Indian and Sicilian Defense. He was awarded the GM title in 1950.

The game was played with the opening of King’s Indian Defense and if you see the Black player’s expertise in this area, you will realize why he could teach a thing or two to White in the conduct of the game!

The diagram shows the position after 18 moves have been played.

diagonal attack on castled king

At first sight, it may not look like a storm brewing. But if you note the open Bishop diagonals with Black’s KB targeting h7, QB having a control on c8-h3 diagonal though sitting at his home (which may have made the position look innocuous), White’s Queen ready to join his Knight sitting pretty at h5 and above all, White pieces in very passive positions posing no immediate counter-threat, the situation was asking for trouble! In fact, when you play through the game given at the end, you will find that through the previous few moves and unwise exchanges, White handed over the initiative to Black.

This is how Black demolished White’s position within a few moves.

19. Qd2 Qh4   Black threatened 20. … Bxh2#
20. g3 Nxg3  
21. hxg3 Qxg3+   If 21. Nde2 then 21. … Nxf1 threatening the Queen as well as 22. … Qxh2#. If 22. Kxf1 then 22. … Bh3+ 23. Kg1 Qh2#
22. Bg2 Bh3   White resigned.

 

Black’s threat of Qxg2# needed White Queen or Rook on 2nd rank and this could be exploited by Black in several ways.

To prevent 23. … Bxd4+ 24. Qxd4 Qxg2#, White could try several optins all resulting in checkmate or material loss to give win to Black e.g.

23. Re2 Qh2+ 24. Kf2 Bg3+ 25. Kf1 Qh1#.

23. Re2 Qh2+ 24. Kf2 Bg3+ 25. Ke3 Bf4+ loses Queen

23. Re2 Qh2+ 24. Kf1 Qh1+ 25. Kf2 Qxg2+ 26. Ke3 Bf4+ 27. Kd3 (27. Kxf4 Qg5#) Bxd2 28. Rxg2 Bxg2 29. Kxd2 c5 30. Nde2 Bxf3 wins.

23. Qf2 Bxd4 loses Queen.

23. Qe2 Qh2+ 24. Kf1 Qh1+ 25. Kf2 Bxd4+ 26. Kg3 Be5+ 27. Kh4 g5+ 28. Kh5 Bg4+ 29. Kxg4 Qh4+ 30. Kf5 Qf4#.

23. Qe2 Qh2+ 24. Kf1 Qh1+ 25. Kf2 Bxd4+ 26. Kg3 Be5+ 27. Kf2 Qxg2+ 28. Ke3 Qxe2+ 29. Rxe2 Bxc3 (29. Nxe2 Bxa1 30. Rxa1 Be6) 30. Rh1 Be6 31. Rc2 Bg7 (31. Rxh6 Bxc4 32. Rc2 Bg7) wins.

23. Qc2 (or Qb2) Qh2+ 24. Kf1 Qh1+ 25. Ke2 Qxg2+ 26. Kd1 Bxd4 27. Rc1 Qxc2+ 28. Kxc2 Bxc3 29. Kxc3 cxb6 wins.

In the articles explaining the nuances of Bishop sacrifice with many types of situations, you should understand that it is rarely possible to make it exhaustive as the variations can be so many. What is important for you is to understand the principles that make such diagonal attacks work and you should be able to identify when such situations arise and modify the basic tactics as per the position. In the present example, though considerably different, most of the pieces involved were same viz. Queen, Knight and two Bishops, the position offered open diagonals, and the attacked side did not have minor pieces close at hand that could help in defending the castle. If you have the ingrediemts and know the recipe (the attacking tactics adapted to the variables), you can always cook up something! And as they say, practice makes perfect!

 

Chess Tactics: Attacking castled King with the classic Bishop sacrifice Part 4

0
Filed under Attacking tactics, Chess Strategy, Chess tactics, Featured Chess Tips
Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Position of white pieces

Before considering the sacrifice of light squared white bishop, it has to be ensured that:

  • the light squared white bishop is in the diagonal b1-h7 and there should not be any pieces hindering the movement of the bishop to h7 – if this is not fulfilled, there is no possibility for this attack at all in the first instance
  • There is no necessity that the bishop should capture the pawn at h7 – I mean there is no compulsion that the pawn should be there in h7. It is not even a necessity that the bishop should give a check on the black King. In other words, the King may not be at g8 square in some occasional cases.
  • the white knight should have been placed within the easy reach of the g5 square to give check on the black King when it captures the light-squared white bishop; in other words, the white knight should be either in f3 or h3 or in e4
  • The White queen should be capable of reaching h5 square, if possible, or else should be able to move to the “h” file

Position of black pieces

The position of the black pieces should meet the following guidelines:

  • Pieces should be there in the f7 and g7 squares.  In most cases, it would be only the pawns; but in certain cases, the dark-squared black bishop might be In g7
  • If the black queen and the rook occupy the d8 and f8 squares, then it would be ideal and the probability of attack on castled king sacrificing the bishop at h7 will be successful
  • It has to be ensured that the Black Knight is not anywhere near the f6 square and cannot be moved to that square instantly.
  • There should not be any threat for the b1-h7 diagonal from black’s Queen or light-squared bishop.

White has to ensure that the above conditions are completely met before embarking on this attack on the black King by sacrificing the light squared bishop.

Lastly one of the variations you might be interested in looking at with reference to following diagram seen in Part 1 of this series:

1stsacimage

(White to move)

7. Bxh7+ Kh8  
8. Ng5 g6 White needs to move Knight to open d1-h5 line. 8…g6 tries to prevent White’s 9.Qh5
 
9. h5 Bxg5 Hoping for 10.Bxg5 Qxg5 11.hxg6 Nf4
 
10. hxg6 Nf4 Trying to prevent 11.Qh5
11. Bxf4 Bxf4  
12. Bg8+ Kxg8 12… Kg7 gives same result
 
13. Qh5 1 – 0 Checkmate on next move 14. Qh7# or 14.Qh8# depending on Black’s 13th move

Chess Tactics: Attacking castled King with the classic Bishop sacrifice Part 2

0
Filed under Attacking tactics, Chess Strategy, Chess tactics, Featured Chess Tips
Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , ,

In Part 1 of Chess Tactics: Attacking castled King with the classic Bishop sacrifice, we looked at the main variation of the bishop sacrifice in Part 2 we will look at some of the possible variations.

Variation #1 – Capturing the Knight by dark squared black Bishop

bishopcapture

7. Bxh7+ Kxh7
8. Ng5+ Bxg5
9. hxg5+ Kg6
10. Qh5+ Kf5
11. Qh3+ Kg6
12. Qh7# 1 – 0

 
Variation #2 – Moving the King to h6

kingh6

7. Bxh7+ Kxh7
8. Ng5+ Kh6
9. Nxe6+ …. Here the black Queen is lost following a discovered check from Bishop at c1

 
Variation #3 – moving the king to g6

kingg6

7. Bxh7+ Kxh7
8. Ng5+ Kg6
9. h5+ Kh6
10. Nxe6+ …. Discovered check and threat on black Queen

 
Variation #4 – moving the king to f5 after g6

kf5move

7. Bxh7+ Kxh7
8. Ng5+ Kg6
9. h5+ Kf5
10. g4# 1 – 0

 
All the variations lead to one conclusion – victory to white led by the sacrifice of the light-squared bishop at h7. The attacking prowess of the bishop is unleashed at its entirety in the attacking of the castled king.

Ironically, the Greco’s sacrifice of the classic bishop sacrifice, which was recorded as early as 1619 in Greco’s handbook, was systematically reviewed and in 1911 by E. Vollemy. Since then, this classic bishop sacrifice is occasionally used as an attacking option, especially by the player playing white pieces.

Continue reading Part 3 of Classical Bishop Sacrifice….

Chess Tactics: Attacking castled King with the classic Bishop sacrifice Part 1

11
Filed under Attacking tactics, Chess Strategy, Chess tactics, Featured Chess Tips
Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , ,

In the game of chess, bishops play a very important role both in attacking the opponent’s King as well as in defending one’s own King, especially using its unique capability of moving along the diagonals.

Before dwelling further into the attacking aspects of the bishop, let us recollect some of the basic features of the opening principles. In the opening stages of the game, we were taught that the pawn movements should be kept to the minimum such that the minor pieces such as knights and bishops are developed. Then the next thing one is advised to do is to go for castling either on the kingside or in the queenside, whereby the King is safeguarded, and the rooks at the flanks are brought to the center of the first or last ranks.

Mere castling of the king will not guarantee 100% safety and the castling should be followed with adequate precautionary measures in order to avoid devastating attack on the kingside by the bishops along the diagonals, especially the light-squared white bishop. Sounds strange – is it not? Read on.

This attack is primarily suitable for the player using white pieces when and only when the opponent castles on the kingside and the king is placed at g8 with pawns placed at f7, g7 and h7 respectively. The broad idea is to sacrifice the light-squared bishop of white by capturing the pawn at h7, drawing the king out and using the knight at g5 and the Queen moved to the “h” rank to say checkmate.

This attack on the castled black king by sacrificing the light-squared white bishop at h7 is called as the classic bishop sacrifice. This is one of the oldest attacks on the castled king, tried and tested as early as early 1600s, as writing about this attack is found in Gioachino Greco’s handbook in 1619. It is believed that Greco introduced this classic bishop sacrifice and as such the attack is also referred to as Greco’s sacrifice by some of the writers.

Before exploring more about this Greco’s sacrifice or classic bishop sacrifice, let us look at the game played by Greco where he employed this attack successfully. As per Greco’s handbook of 1619, he reached the position in the game as given below after six not particularly intelligent moves.

1stsacimage

(White to move)

Now, here comes the brilliant display of white involving the classic bishop sacrifice.

The mainline of the game is as follows :

7. Bxh7+ Kxh7
8. Ng5+ Kg8
9. Qh5 Re8
10. Qh7+ Kf8
11. Qh8# 1 – 0 There ends the game in white’s favor after the sacrifice of the light-squared bishop.

 
In Part 2 of Attacking castled King with the classic Bishop sacrifice we will look at some of the variations and how to play those variations for a win. Continue reading Part 2 of Bishop Sacrifice.